VIPIN KUMAR @ SONU S/O KAMLESH KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/16951/2025 · 2025-12-19
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42177 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42177 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:51721] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16951/2025
1. Vipin Kumar @ Sonu S/o Kamlesh Kumar, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Gothda, Police Station Mantown, Sawai Madhopur (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur)
2. Abhishek S/o Jagdish, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Sandila Police Station Nainwa District Bundi ( At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 19/12/2025
1. This criminal miscellaneous bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 in respect of FIR No. 361/2025 registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 112(2) and 61(2) (a) of BNS and Section 66-D of I.T. Act and Section 13 of the RPGO Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the FIR in question, whereas they have not committed any offence whatsoever.
Learned counsel further submits that even otherwise, the offences
[2025:RJ-JP:51721] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16951/2025] alleged against the petitioners are triable by Magistrate and co- accused Vikas S/o Babulal and Hanush Kumar S/o Suresh Kumar have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.12.2025 passed in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Applications No.14314/2025 and 14315/2025 respectively. Learned counsel also submits that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has already been filed and therefore, he is no longer required for any custodial interrogation. In the instant matter trial is likely to take considerably long time. Hence, a prayer has been made to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed this bail application. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and in the light of the fact that the alleged offences against the petitioners are triable by Magistrate as well as co-accused Vikas S/o Babulal and Hanush Kumar S/o Suresh Kumar have already been enlarged on bail by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.12.2025 passed in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Applications No.14314/2025 and 14315/2025 respectively as well as the fact that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has already been filed, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Accordingly, this Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioners Vipin Kumar @ Sonu S/o Kamlesh Kumar and Abhishek S/o Jagdish shall be released on bail in
[2025:RJ-JP:51721] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16951/2025] pursuance of FIR No. 361/2025 registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each. That apart, the accused-petitioners shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) They shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) They shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) They shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless their presence are exempted by the trial Court. (iv) They shall regularly mark their attendance in the concerned Police Station on 25th day of every month. Concerned S.H.O. shall maintain the register of attendance of the accused-petitioners.
(v) On repetition of similar nature of offence during trial, the instant bail shall stand automatically cancelled. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /5