Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34594 RSA No. 1319 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1319 OF 2022 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:
NANJAIAH S/O AMASAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT HULLENAHALLI VILLAGE NUGGENAHALLI HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 116 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAJENDRA V.G., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. CHANDRAIAH S/O LATE RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
2. RANGAMMA W/O LATE RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
BOTH ARE R/AT HULLENAHALLI VILLGE NUGGENAHALLI HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT PIN CODE - 573 116 …RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.09.2021 PASSED IN RA.NO.10/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.
Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34594 RSA No. 1319 of 2022
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNARAYAPATNA.
ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.12.2017 PASSED IN O.S.NO.123/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JDUGE AND JMFC, CHANNARAYAPATNA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 02.09.2025 for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:
"The undersigned counsel appearing for the appellant most respectfully submits as follows:
It is submitted that, the appellant has instructed over the phone to withdraw the appeal. Hence this memo is filed.
Wherefore, it is most respectfully pray that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. Memo is taken on record.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34594 RSA No. 1319 of 2022
3. In view of the above memo, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25 CT-SG