[2025:RJ-JP:51837] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 27888/2018 Jheengguria Prasad S/o Shri Manohari Lal, Aged About 52 Years, R/o P.h.e.d. Colony, Ucchain, Tehsil And District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Public Health And Engineer Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Chief Engineer (Adm.), Public Health And Engineer Department, Jal Bhawan, Jacab Road, 2-Civil Lines, Jaipur. 3. Superintending Engineer, Public Health And Engineer Department, Circle Office Bharatpur 4. Executive Engineer, Public Health And Engineer Department, Division Bayana, Distt. Bharatpur 5. Assistant Engineer, Public Health And Engineer Department, Sub-Division-Roopwas, Bharatpur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. V.K. Singhal Mr. Harshvardhan Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- (i). By an appropriate order or direction, the order dated 06.08.2018 passed by the respondents may kindly be quashed and set aside. (ii). By an appropriate order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to grant [2025:RJ-JP:51837] (2 of 3) [CW-27888/2018] the benefits of post of electrician-II to the petitioner from the date of discharging the duties of electrician-II i.e. 19.05.1990 (date of joining) with all consequential benefits including seniority, arrears etc. as granted to similarly situated person namely; Hariom vide order dated 10.12.2003 by making necessary amendments in the order dated 04.09.2018 qua the petitioner. (iii). By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to declare the petitioner semi-permanent on the post of Electrician-II instead of Helper on completion of 2 years service from the date of his initial appointment or assigning the duties of Electrician with all consequential benefits by amending the order dated 04.09.2018. (iv). Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon’ble Tribunal deems expedient in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly passed in favour of the petitioner. 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the [2025:RJ-JP:51837] (3 of 3) [CW-27888/2018] decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /131