Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4217 (AP)

B V R SIVAKUMAR v. SRI CH DWARAKA TIRUMALA RAO IPS

CC/178/2025 · 2025-02-21

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010029092025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 178/2025 Between: 1. B V R SIVAKUMAR, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, PROGRAMMER, P.C.S AND S, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI CH DWARAKA TIRUMALA RAO IPS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED 59 YEARS THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (HOPF), ANDHRA PRADESH, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI M SESHASAYANA RAO, S/O. AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, GAZETTED ESTABLISHMENT SECTION, D.G.P. OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI S V RAJASEKHARA BABU IPS, S/O. AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, TECHNICAL SERVICES, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue Notice of Contempt to the Respondents No.1 to 3 and thereby punish them in terms of Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, for deliberate and willful dis-obedience of the SRS,J C.C.No.178 of 2025 Orders of this Hon’ble Court passed in W.P.No. 28739 of 2024 dated 09-12- 2024 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to consider the additional affidavit and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to consider the additional affidavit and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S CHAKRAPANI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case is filed complaining about the violation of the order dated 09.12.2024 in W.P.No.28739 of 2024. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on either side. 3. W.P.No.28739 of 2024 is filed to declare the action of respondent No.1 in not passing orders on the resignation submitted by the petitioner dated 12.07.2024, as illegal and arbitrary. 4. By order dated 09.12.2024, the aforementioned writ petition was disposed of, directing respondent No.1 to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner’s resignation dated 12.07.2024, strictly per the Rules. Thereafter, the Director of General of Police, by proceedings in Rc.No.157/G2/2024, SRS,J C.C.No.178 of 2025 dated 05.02.2025, accepted the petitioner's resignation, subject to the outcome of W.P.No.8597 of 2021. Learned counsel for the petitioner endorses the same. 5. Thus, as seen from the proceedings of the Director General of Police, as referred supra, the resignation of the petitioner was accepted, subject to the outcome of W.P.No.8597 of 2021. The order in W.P.No. 8597 of 2021 has been complied with. Hence, this Court does not find any violation of the order dated 09.12.2024 in W.P.No.28739 of 2024. 6. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 21.02.2025 TVN SRS,J C.C.No.178 of 2025 162 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.178 OF 2025 Date : 21.02.2025 TVN