[2025:RJ-JP:35728] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10471/2025 Yogendra Kumar Sharma @ Yash @ Pappan S/o Late Shri Rameshwar Sharma, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Mohalla Bohro Ka Bas, Village Chandlai, Thana Shivdaspura, District Jaipur. (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ugrasen Yadav Mr. Purushottam Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Vichitra for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/08/2025 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Yogendra Kumar Sharma @ Yash @ Pappan seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.177/2025 dated 17.05.2025 registered at P.S. Bajaj Nagar, District – Jaipur City (East), for the offence under Sections 64(2)(m), 115(2) and 126(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not [2025:RJ-JP:35728] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-10471/2025] have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the age of victim is 27 years and she is in relation with petitioner- accused since 2024 but in year 2025 there was some dispute between the petitioner and the prosecutrix and on some enticement by unknown person, she has registered a case against the petitioner accused. He further referred photograph, Instagram reels and chat between prosecutrix and the present petitioner and submitted that both have enjoyed good time in consensual manner but now she has registered a case with false facts. He also submits that the age of present petitioner is 22 years and it is a case of consensual in nature, therefore, the petitioner accused is entitled for bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. He has also filed a report received from concerned Police Station. 5. Learned counsel for the complainant opposed the bail application and while submitting reply and objection to the bail application submitted that this is not a case of false implication rather the petitioner accused has not only intimidated her but also used criminal force upon her. He further submitted that victim is a Government servant and she has suffered mental and physical trauma due to act committed by the present petitioner accused. He further [2025:RJ-JP:35728] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-10471/2025] referred a protection writ filed before this Hon’ble Court and referred order dated 01.07.2025 submitted that the present petitioner has brutally assaulted victim and has sent threatening messages on WhatsApp and Instagram. He further referred cutting of newspaper and submitted that the petitioner accused has even fired upon police. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 7. On 17.05.2025, a 27 years old prosecutrix has registered a complaint of intimidation, harassment and rape by petitioner accused and after registration of detailed FIR, the matter is investigated. After investigation, the police has filed a charge-sheet against the petitioner accused. The material on record indicate that a proceeding under Sections 126 and 170 of BNS is also effected against the petitioner accused on 17.05.2025 wherein also petitioner accused was bound down by police. 8. We have considered material submitted by both the parties and at this stage, it is not possible to express any opinion about the material. The victim has alleged threat and intimidation from the petitioner accused. 9. The facts and the material indicate that the alleged offence are of serious nature and role attributed to applicant is prima facie sufficient to consider complicity of applicant in the crime. Therefore, at this juncture, considering the evidence collected so far, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant accused on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:35728] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-10471/2025] 10. Considering the gravity of allegations and overall facts and circumstances of the case, it is appropriate to dismiss the bail application of the applicant accused at this stage. 11. Accordingly, the application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS preferred by the petitioner accused Yogendra Kumar Sharma @ Yash @ Pappan is hereby dismissed. 12. The trial Court is directed to record statement of prosecutrix on priority basis. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/222