KVM 60 - RPW(ST) 25651-2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.76 OF 2023 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 25651 OF 2022 Shaikh Mehboob Abdul Rashid ...Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Shaikh Mehboob Abdul Rashid ...Review Petitioner V/s. Suprabhat Shikshan Mandal Thr. Secretary & Ors. ...Respondents ______________________ Mr. S. G. Kudle a/w. Mr.Kishor D. Jadhav for Applicant/Review Petitioner. Mr.Vishwasrao S. Deokar for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 6. Mr.Rupesh K. Bobade a/w. Ms.Shradha K. Nakadi for Respondent No.3. ______________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 02nd JULY, 2025 P.C.:- 1) This is an Application for condonation of delay of 162 days in filing the present Review Petition. 2) Mr. Deokar, learned Advocate appearing for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 6 vehemently opposed the Application and submitted that, no explanation for condonation of the said inordinate delay is offered by 1/2 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Digitally signed by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2025.07.11 18:07:49 +0530 KVM 60 - RPW(ST) 25651-2022.doc Applicant. He submitted that, by filing repeated proceedings before this Court, Applicant is causing sheer harassment to his clients. 3) Mr.Kudle, learned Advocate appearing for Applicant on instructions submitted that, for condonation of the said delay, Applicant will pay a cost of Rs.2,500/- to the Kirtikar Law Library, High Court, Mumbai within a period of two weeks from the date of uploading of the present Order on the official website of High Court, Mumbai. The said statement is accepted as an undertaking given to this Court. 4) Subject to payment of the aforestated cost to the said Library, delay is condoned and Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2