Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4216 (BOM)

YASMEEN BEE MAHEMUD BEG v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/10910/2025 · 2026-08-31

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} 105-wp-10910-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 105 WRIT PETITION NO. 10910 OF 2025 Yasmeen Bee Mahemud Beg & Another VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. Vijaykumar C. Patil (Ashtekar), Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. V.M. Kagne, AGP for State Mr. Shaikh Nasimoddin Rafiyoddin, Advocate for Respondents No. 3 and 4 ....... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT : 1. By this petition, Petitioners are seeking directions to Respondent/Management to give appointment to Petitioner No. 2 on compassionate ground. 2. Learned Advocate for the Management submits that the there is already one surplus teacher working in the school and there are no vacancies as on today. He further submits that petitioners have approached after six years of delay and petitioners have received 14,00,000/- gratuity and they are getting family pension of Rs. 33,000/- per month. 2026:BHC-AUG:39687-DB {2} 105-wp-10910-2025 3. Be that as it may, it is the case of the petitioners that one employee is likely to retire on superannuation in the near future. 4. We dispose of the writ petition by directing Respondent/Management to consider the case of Petitioner No. 2 sympathetically for future vacancies. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Bhagyawant Punde