Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42159 (RAJ)

DR. MAHENDRA SINGH S/O SH. RAM SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15368/2025 · 2025-10-10

Baljinder Singh Sandhu, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41316-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15368/2025 Dr. Mahendra Singh S/o Sh. Ram Singh, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, Near Hospital, Nadbai, Dissti. Bharatpur Rajasthan-321602 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikita, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretarait, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Director, Department Of Ayurved, Government Of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 4. The Director Pension Department, Rajasthan Government, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhuvnesh Tiwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma, AAAG with Ms. Sunita Meena, AGC, Ms. Epsa Nangalia & Mr. Akash Mewara Mr. Aditya Godara, AAAG & Mr. Rohan Mittal HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 10/10/2025 1. Issue notice. 2. Mr. Aditya Godara, learned counsel, associate of Ms. Mahi Yadav, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.2 and 4. [2025:RJ-JP:41316-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-15368/2025] 3. Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma and Ms. Sunita Meena, learned counsels, associates of Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 3. 4. Both the learned counsels are ad idem that in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. vs. Pyare Lal Meena & Ors. (Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.10560/2024), the issue raised in the present petition stands finally adjudicated, and the age of Ayush doctors has to be treated at par with Allopathic doctors and they would attain superannuation at the age of 62 years. 5. Since the petitioner is presently serving with the Department, he shall be allowed to continue in service till he attains the age of 62 years and would be paid regular salary. The retiral benefits will also accrue to him after he attains superannuation of 62 years. 6. In view of the above, the present Civil Writ Petition is, accordingly, allowed. 7. Pending application(s) stand disposed of. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ MAHIMA/RAHUL/30