Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42153 (RAJ)

KAMAL KISHOR S/O SH. BHANWARLAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13169/2025 · 2025-10-17

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13168/2025 Jaswant Singh @ Shiv S/o Sh. Kalu Singh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Atitmand, Police Station Saket Nagar, District Beawar. (At Present Confined In District Jail Beawar) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13169/2025 Kamal Kishor S/o Sh. Bhanwarlal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Atit- mand, Police Station Saket Nagar, District Beawar. (At Present Confined In District Jail Beawar) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sikandar Singh Sakkarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/10/2025 1. Both bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. have been filed by the petitioners in connection with the FIR No. 357/2025 registered at Police Station Saket Nagar, District Beawar wherein they have been charged for the offences punishable under Sec- tions 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 189(2) of BNS, 2023 and subse- quently they have been charged for the offences under Sections (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13168/2025] 115(2), 126(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of BNS and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. 2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that both the com- plainant and the petitioners used firearm against each other. Counsel further submits that injured has sustained grievous injury on his leg by the firearm and has not sustained any injury on any vital parts of the body. Counsel submits that petitioners have been in custody since the date of their arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioners. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail appli- cation. 4 Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and pe- rused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned coun- sel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that the injured has not sustained any injury on any vital part of the body and also considering the fact that the petitioners have been in custody since the date of their arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on the merits and de- merits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioners under Section 483 BNSS. 6. 6. Accordingly, both bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petition- ers- Jaswant Singh @ Shiv S/o Sh. Kalu Singh and Kamal Kishor S/o Sh. Bhanwarlal arrested in connection with afore- mentioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided each of them (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13168/2025] furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/238-239