APHC010087732025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4742/2025 Between: 1. VANKA SATYANARAYANA,, S/O.VANKA SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, D.NO. 16-16-128, NEAR PEDDA AMMARU TEMPLE, DUMMULAPETA, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. VANKA VARA LAKSHMI,, VANKA SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, D.NO. 16-16-128, NEAR PEDDA AMMARU TEMPLE, DUMMULAPETA, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SARPAVARAM POLICE STATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 5. SRI GURRAM BERNAISE, S/O. GURRAM BABJI, D.NO. 52-1-4, H.B. COLONY, NEAR RAILWAY GAGE, PALAKOLLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the in-action of the respondent police in taking action on the complaint dated 03-01-2025 filed by the petitioners against the 5th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, DIRECT the respondent police to take action on the complaint dated 03.01.2025 filed by the petitioners against the 5th respondent Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: “ ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the in-action of the respondent police in taking action on the complaint dated 03-01-2025 filed by the petitioners against the 5th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, DIRECT the respondent police to take action on the complaint dated 03.01.2025 filed by the petitioners against the 5th respondent ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record written instructions and would submit that Petitioner No.2 submitted a complaint in PGRS grievance cell on 02.12.2024, the same was forwarded to respondent No.3, during investigation, it revealed the dispute between the parties is purely civil in nature, no crime is registered, and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Considering the submissions, since there is a statutory remedy available to the Petitioners under BNSS, 2023, Petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedy before appropriate forum according to law. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 04.12.2025 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No.4742 of 2025 04.12.2025 Mjl /*