SAMEER S/O SHRI MOHAMMED NAEEM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12167/2025 · 2025-10-17
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42151 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42151 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42717] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.12167/2025 Sameer S/o Shri Mohammed Naeem, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 42 Vijayraj Colony Nai Ki Thadi Police Station Jaisinghpura Khor Jaipur Notrh. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Amir Khan S/o Alisher, R/o Abdul Bhai Ka Makan Panni Garo Ki Masjid Ke Picche 60 Feet Road Nai Ki Thadi Jaisingpura Khor Jaipur City North (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Ali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Addl. GA-cum-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 17/10/2025
1. This bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by petitioner in connection with the FIR No.75/2025 registered at Police Station Jaisinghpura Khor, District Jaipur City (North) wherein he has been charged for the offences punishable under Section 137(2) BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the course of the trial when the statement of prosecutrix PW-1 “X” was recorded, she has not supported the version of prosecution, hence, she has been declared as hostile. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has been in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner.
[2025:RJ-JP:42717] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12167/2025]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that prosecutrix has been declared as hostile, and also considering the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS.
6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Sameer S/o Shri Mohammed Naeem arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing, and as and when called upon to do so.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/503