APHC010333562016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 11610/2016 Between: 1. RADIENT ASSOCIATION (REGD.NO.9/2001),, 11-91, BIG MOSQUE STREET, KANIGIRI, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, S.ZAHEER AHMED, S/O. S.A.K JEELANI, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS, RIO. KANIGIRI, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 2. SHAIK JAMSHEER AHMED,, S/O. SHARI SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, PROPRIETOR OF M/S. FAIZAN ELECTRICAL & CIVIL CONTRACTOR, D.NO.8-292, KOTHAPETA, KANIGIRI, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 3. BERL PULLA REDDY,, S/O. CHINNA KONA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, PROPRIETOR OF M/S. SRI PRASANNANJANEYA SWAMY ELECTRICAL & HARDWARE, CHITHAPALEM, KANIGIRI, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD, VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, VIJAYAWADA ZONE, A.P TRANSCO, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., VIJAYAWADA ZONE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. M/ S KANIGIRI DURGAM ELECTRICAL MAN POWER LABOUR CONTRACT, COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., KANIGIRI, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): SRI TALLAPRAGADA SRIRAM, LEARNED JUNIOR STANDING COUNSEL FOR TRANSCO The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: None appeared for the Writ Petitioners. 2. Sri Tallapragada Sriram, learned Junior Standing Counsel for Respondent No. 2, is present. 3. This Writ Petition is filed challenging the Award of Contract in favour of Respondent No. 5 (Ex.P.1), dated 30.03.2016, which indicates that the Award of Contract was for the period from 01.04.2016 up to 31.03.2019. 4. In this view of the matter, the period of the Contract has long expired, and therefore, this Writ Petition has become Infructuous. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as having become Infructuous. No order as to costs. 1. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 31.10.2025 DSV 200 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 11610/2016 31.10.2025 DSV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 11610/2016 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 31.10.2025 GRKP, J Writ Petition is disposed of as Infructuous. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV