APHC010029362011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3483/2011 Between: 1. DR. C. MADHAVA RAO, S/O. LAKSHMANA DAS R/O. 204, TARA TOWERS, NCB NAIDU COLONY, BENZ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA - 520 010. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY POCET- 14, SECTOR - 8, DWARAKA, NEW DELHI - 110 077. 2. P S INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL CHINAOUTPALLI, GANNAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521 286. 3. THE ANDHRA PRADESH MEDICAL COUNCIL, REP. BY IT'S REGISTRAR SULTAN BAZAR, HYDERABAD - 500 095. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Proceeding No. MCI-211(2)(MT-028)/2009-Ethics/61566 dated 03/02/2011 and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal, ultravires, unconstitutional and violative of petitioner's rights guaranteed under Article 14, 16 and 19 of the Constitution of India. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 4303 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of proceedings issued by the 1st respondent in Proceeding No. MCI-211(2)(MT-028)/2009- Ethics/61566 dated 03/02/2011. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 33088 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R SUDHEER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V ANIL KUMAR 2. -- The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 3483 of 2011 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting his case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 11.07.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Writ Petition No:3483 of 2011 Date : 11.07.2025 SPP