APHC010278852013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] SATURDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 684/2013 Between: 1. MADDIPATI ABBULU, S/O. LATE SURYA RAO H.NO. 6-1-107 PANGIDIGUDEM ROAD, JANGAREDDIGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...APPELLANT AND 1. SMT MADDIPATI TULASI VANI ANOTHER, W/O. POSIBABU R/O. POTHAVARAM VILLAGE, NALLAJARLA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. MADDIPATI POSIBABU, S/O. ABBULU H.NO. 8-3-234/535, 5TH FLOOR, L.N.NAGAR, YOUSUF GUDA, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against ordersfiled under section 47 of Guardian and wards act, aggrieved by the order of the Principal District Judge, West Godavari District, Eluru dt. 01/04/2013 in OP.No. 282 of 2012 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CMAMP 1529 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to permit the petitioner to visit his grand son "Saran Sai Datta" weekly once and to spend with him on every sunday from 10.00 A.M., to 05.00 P.M. by taking him along with him during the pendency of the appeal in the interest of justice Counsel for the Appellant: 1. K JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. NARASIMHA RAO DAVULURI The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 684/2013 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) The petition filed by the father seeking appointment as guardian of minor child and seeking custody of the minor child under Sections 6 to 8, 11, 15 and 17 of Guardian and Wards Act and Section 151 CPC was dismissed by the learned Principal District Judge at West Godavari, Eluru. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal was preferred by the father. 2. Ms. V.Sowmya, learned counsel representing Sri K.Jyothi Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant submits that during pendency of the appeal, the minor child attained majority. 3. Since the minor child now attained majority, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 20.12.2025 AG THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 684/2013 Dated: 20.12.2025 AG