APHC010316222004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] THURSDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 8401/2004 Between: 1. PULIKANTI BHASKAR REDDY, ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, APSEB(E) TIRUPATHI, R/O SAI NAGAR COLONY, BAIRAGIPATTEDA, TIRUPATHI ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER AND 3 OTHERS, HYDERABAD 2. THE CHAIRMAN A P STATE ELECTRICITY, BOARD, HYDERABAD 3. THE PAY OFFICER CORPORATE OFFICE, APSPDCP., TIRUPATHI 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATIONS, TIRUPATHI ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particulary one in the nature Natureof Writ of Mandamus calling for the impugned proceedings the pay Officer, Corporate Office, APSPDCL, in Lr. No. PO/SPDCL/TPT/JAO/JPO/D.No. 1368/03, dated 10-4-2003, and set aside the same with a direction to the respondent to regulate the suspension period from 1-7-96 to 5-3-2000 as per the Fundamental Rules and to Clear theincrements due tothe petitioner after reinstatement from 6-3-2000 onwards as per Fundamental Rules and pay the monetary benefits dueto the petitioner by considering his case for due promotion and to clear the pensionary benefits IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WVMP 1536 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim direction granted on 29-4-2004 IA NO: 2 OF 2004(WPMP 10886 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the resspondents to regulate the suspension period from 1-7-96 to 5-3- 2000 and to clear the increments due to the petitioenr after his reinstatement to duty with effect from 6-3-2000 and pay monetary benefits dueto him forthwith IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 25413 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to delete the GM&CHAIRMAN, APSEB (NOW APTRANSCO) / APTRANSO as Respondents from the WP No. 8401/2004 in the interest of justice and equity and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P S MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. METTA CHANDRASEKHARA RAO 2. S RAVINDRANATH 3. P LAKSHMA REDDY 4. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION No.8401 of 2004 ORDER: When the matter was called on 22.09.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, as such, this Court directed the matter to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no presentation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ petition. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed. _______________________ CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J 06.11.2025 SS