[2025:RJ-JP:42860] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16058/2025 Shankar Lal Yadav S/o Ramesh Prasad Yadav, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Ward No. 3, Dhani Bagryali, Village Bilanderpur, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur , Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat Ra- jasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education (Headquarter), Ajmer. 4. The District Election Officer (Collector), Ajmer. 5. The Election Registration Officer (Sdm), Kishangarh, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 01.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13194/2025 Kuldeep Singh Bansiwal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., Order dated 04.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13367/2025 (Bharat Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and order dated 23.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14524/2025 (Vinita Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and submits that the controversy raised herein is squarely [2025:RJ-JP:42860] (2 of 2) [CW-16058/2025] covered by an order passed by a Co-ordinate bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12975/2025) and accordingly this writ petition be disposed of. 2. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for pe- titioner and on perusal of judgment in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) and followed in subsequently de- cided case, this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation within a period of 4 weeks from today. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a fresh representation to respondents within a period of four weeks raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation, in light of ratio laid down in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra). After passing the order, the respon- dents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the pe- titioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he will have a right to re-approach the Court with fresh petition. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /73