Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42145 (RAJ)

NARESH S/O SODANLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11277/2025 · 2025-09-25

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39677] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11277/2025 1. Naresh S/o Sodanlal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Bamandevriya, Police Station Unhel, District Jhalawar (Raj.). (Presently Confined In Sub Jail At Bhawani Mandi). 2. Dhanraj S/o Nagu Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bamandevriya, Police Station Unhel, District Jhalawar (Raj.). (Presently Confined In Sub Jail At Bhawani Mandi). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/09/2025 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicants-accused Naresh S/o Sodanlal and Dhanraj S/o Nagu Singh seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.334/2025 dated 26.07.2025 registered at P.S. Bhawani Mandi District - Jhalawar, for the offence under Sections 303(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against them is complete and they are no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicants do not have [2025:RJ-JP:39677] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11277/2025] any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicants undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that a report is registered for theft of pickup on 26.07.2025 against unknown persons. He further submitted that during investigation, police has arrested Naresh and Dhanraj and allgedly recovered pickup from open place. He also submitted that two criminal cases each were registered against these petitioners and charge-sheet has already been drawn by police, and same is triable by Magistrate. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. He has also filed a report received from concerned Police Station. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On the basis of report dated 26.07.2025 about theft of vehicle in the night of 25.07.2025 a complaint is registered at instance of complainant Bagdiram against unknown thieves. On the basis of information from informer, both the petitioners were arrested during nakabandi and pikcup is recovered. Two criminal cases each were registered against petitioner. Charge-sheet has been filed by police. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicants-accused are no more required in the investigation and they are in custody for quite some [2025:RJ-JP:39677] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11277/2025] time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicants-accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Naresh S/o Sodanlal and Dhanraj S/o Nagu Singh, is hereby allowed and the applicants-accused are ordered to be released on bail with condition that each of the petitioner would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /116