Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42145 (CHH)

PRAVINCHAND SURANA v. DHANVANTEEN BAI

WP227/882/2025 · 2025-09-07

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:45491 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 882 of 2025 1. Pravinchand Surana S/o Late Prem Chand Surana Aged About 60 Years R/o Jawahar Chowk, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) 2. Tikamchand @ Sunil Surana S/o Late Prem Chand Surana Aged About 57 Years R/o Jawahar Chowk, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) 3. Gulabchand Surana @ Anil Kumar S/o Late Prem Chand Surana Aged About 56 Years R/o Jawahar Chowk, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Dhanvanteen Bai Wd/o Late Dwarka Prasad Soni Aged About 74 Years R/o Infront Of Municipal Corporation Garden, Shikshak Nagar, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) 2. Manohar Soni S/o Late Dwarka Prasad Soni Aged About 53 Years R/o Infront Of Municipal Corporation Garden, Shikshak Nagar, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) 3. Inderchand Soni S/o Late Dwarka Prasad Soni Aged About 51 Years R/o Infront Of Municipal Corporation Garden, Shikshak Nagar, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) 4. Gulabchand Soni S/o Late Dwarka Prasad Soni Aged About 47 Years R/o Infront Of Municipal Corporation Garden, Shikshak Nagar, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Ankur Agrawal, Advocate Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.09.08 14:22:54 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 08/09/2025 1) By way of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following relief(s):- A. A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of appropriate nature do issue commanding to produce before this Hon'ble Court all the relevant records pertaining to the case of the petitioners for its kind perusal. B. A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of appropriate nature do issue the direction to the learned execution court to decide the petitioner's execution bearing no. 46/2024 pending before the execution case between Pravinchand Surana and others Dhanvanteen Bai and others by completing the execution proceedings within specific period of time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. VS C. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts & circumstances of case. D. Cost of the petition may also be awarded. 2) By way of this petition, petitioners are only seeking a direction to the learned Fifth Civil Judge - Senior Division, District - Durg (C.G.) to expedite the proceeding of Execution Case No. 46/2024 which remains pending since year 2024 in light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Rahul S. Shah vs. Jitendra Kumar Gandhi, 2021 (6) SCC 418. 3) Heard. 3 4) Having considered the limited prayer made by Mr. Agrawal, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Executing Court to make all endeavors to conclude the execution proceedings keeping in mind the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Rahul S. Shah (supra). 5) With the aforesaid direction, the instant petition is hereby disposed of. Sd//- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE A j i n k y a