Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4214 (AP)

M M RAHMAN v. S SIRISHA

CC/294/2024 · 2025-07-16

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010029062024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 294/2024 Between: 1. M M RAHMAN, S/O. LATE MASTAN, AGED 80 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O DOOR NO. 20-3-2/C/408, HARI HARA HIGHTS APARTMENTS, AYYAPPA COLONY, TIRUPATI TOWN. 2. MOHAMMAD MANSOOR,, S/O. MS RAHMAN LATE, AGE 63 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.4-15, BRAHMIN STREET, NEW PET, SVUP SCHOOL, CHANDRAGIRI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. N NASEEB, S/O M K RAHMAN LATE AGED 45 YEARS, OCC.GOVT JOB R/O. 201, ANNA TOWERS, SUBHASH NAGAR, NEAR MOSQUE, KOLAGUNTA, TIRUPATI TOWN-517501 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. S SIRISHA, THE TAHSILDAR, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2. B BALAJI, THE MANDAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. S FAHEEMA, PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, THE AGARALA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, AGARALA VILLAGE, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the contemnors/respondents under the provisions of contempt of the courts Act for willfully and wontedly violating the orders of this Honble High Court in W.P.No.1039 OF 2024 dated 10.01.2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KALE VIJAYA RAJU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. P RAVIKANTH 2. G VENKATA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 10.01.2024 passed in W.P.No.1039 of 2024. 2. Sri Kale Vijaya Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in the contempt have been complied with and prayed to close the contempt. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 17th July, 2025 RKS