Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42132 (RAJ)

PARUL TRIVEDI D/O SHRI RAJENDRA PRASAD TRIVEDI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15876/2025 · 2025-10-17

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42687] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15876/2025 1. Parul Trivedi D/o Shri Rajendra Prasad Trivedi, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village And Post Maheshwar Kalan, Tehsil And District Dausa (Raj.) 2. Ayush Trivedi D/o Shri Rajendra Prasad Trivedi, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village And Post Maheshwar Kalan, Tehsil And District Dausa (Raj.) 3. Surendra Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Gyarsi Lal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Peelwa, Post Chandwaji, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Secondary Education Department, Through Its Principle Secretary, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Rajasthan Public Service Commissioner, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer (Raj.) 3. Director, Education Department, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat for Ms. Komal Kumari Giri For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- “(i) The respondents may be directed to accept the offline/online form of petitioners and allow him to participate in the examination and further selection process of school lecturer under advt. Dated 17.07.2025 in the larger interest of justice. (ii) The respondents may further be directed to given appointment to petitioners on the post [2025:RJ-JP:42687] (2 of 2) [CW-15876/2025] of Lecturer School Education, in pursuant to advt. Dated 17.07.2025.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners while referring order dated 08.10.2025 in SB CWP No.15010/2025 titled as Surendra Kumar Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the petitioners be permitted to appear in the selection process after accepting their offline/online form, which they could not filled up due to technical issues. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation after enquiry about grievances of petitioner with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /18