Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33104 CMP No. 478 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO.478 OF 2023 BETWEEN:
1.
SREE GANESH CONSTRUCTIONS RAILWAY CONTRACTORS D.NO.3-281, LAKSHMIPURAM, STONEHOUSEPET, NELLORE-524002 ANDHRAPRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, MR. KOTAM REDDY GIRIDHAR REDDY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJESWARA P.N., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE GENERAL MANAGER SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, HEAD QUARTERS OFFICE, 3RD FLOOR, RAIL SOUDA, EAST BLOCK, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, GADAG ROAD, HUBLI, KARNATAKA-580020.
2.
THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (CENTRAL) HUBBALLI DIVISION, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, KESHWAPUR, HUBBALLI, KARNATAKA-580023.
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33104 CMP No. 478 of 2023
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAY VENUGOPAL, CGC FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS CMP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 READ WITH PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS BY THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT SCHEME, 1996, PRAYING TO APPOINT AN INDEPENDENT ARBITRATOR TO DECIDE THE DISPUTE THAT HAS ARISEN BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENTS PERTAINING TO THE CONTRACT AGREEMENT NO.72/DEN/CENTRAL/SPL/2019- 20 AS PER CLAUSE 11 TO THE PROFORMA-9 OF 08/07/2020 AT ANNEXURE - A AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER OR ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT, IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the claim made by the petitioner herein has been satisfied in terms of the Award dated 06.02.2025 as per the memo dated 23.08.2025 filed by the respondents.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33104 CMP No. 478 of 2023
2. The aforesaid submission has been supported by the
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
3. In that view of the matter, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18