APHC010487312023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT:THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25303/2023 Between: 1. PULIKUNTA PARTHA SARADHI REDDY, S/O.NARAYANA REDDY, 61 YEARS, OCCUPATION. SURPANCH, PULIKUNTA VILLAGE, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEVELOPMENT, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYAT RAJ, , YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYA KADAPA. 5. THE PULIKUNTA GRAM PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PULIKUNTA VILLAGE, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of tne 3rd respondent in taking appropriate action on the representation dated 08.09.2023 of the petitioner made for issuance of suitable orders to continue the office of the Village IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT:THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25303/2023 PULIKUNTA PARTHA SARADHI REDDY, S/O.NARAYANA REDDY, 61 YEARS, OCCUPATION. SURPANCH, PULIKUNTA VILLAGE, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEVELOPMENT, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYAT RAJ, , YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, THE PULIKUNTA GRAM PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PULIKUNTA VILLAGE, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of tne 3rd respondent in taking ate action on the representation dated 08.09.2023 of the petitioner made for issuance of suitable orders to continue the office of the Village IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] PRESENT:THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI PULIKUNTA PARTHA SARADHI REDDY, S/O.NARAYANA REDDY, 61 YEARS, OCCUPATION. SURPANCH, PULIKUNTA VILLAGE, ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEVELOPMENT, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYAT RAJ, , YSR KADAPA T OFFICER, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, THE PULIKUNTA GRAM PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PULIKUNTA VILLAGE, GALIVEEDU ...RESPONDENT(S): praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of tne 3rd respondent in taking ate action on the representation dated 08.09.2023 of the petitioner made for issuance of suitable orders to continue the office of the Village Secretariat in Pulikunta Gram Panchayat, Galiveedu Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the representation dated 08.09.2023 of the petitioner and take immediate action to continue the office of the Pulikunta Village Secretariat in Pulikunta Gram Panchayat, Galiveedu Mandai, YSR Kadapa District, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: ORDER Sri I.Koti Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that cause in this writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2025. RR