Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 212
RAM KUMAR
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Present: Mr.
for the petitioner.
Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana.
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)
The present writ petition has been filed seeking respondents to regularize the decision dated 01.10.2003 and 10.02.2004 (Annexures P the date when the benefit has been granted to the number of similarly situated employees to the petitioner
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner s withdrawal of the present writ petition in view of the disputed questions of fact raised by the respondents and so as to take recourse to the alternative remedy available to him in accordance with law.
Disposed of as withdrawn
APRIL 28, 202 Vishal Sharma
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-10830
Date of Decision:
RAM KUMAR
Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
******* Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana.
*******
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed seeking respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner decision dated 01.10.2003 and 10.02.2004 (Annexures P the date when the benefit has been granted to the number of similarly situated employees to the petitioner
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner s withdrawal of the present writ petition in view of the disputed questions of fact raised by the respondents and so as to take recourse to the alternative remedy available to him in accordance with law.
Disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as afor , 2025
(VINOD S. BHARDWA
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether reportable
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 10830-2019
Date of Decision: 28.04.2025
... Petitioner ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana.
The present writ petition has been filed seeking direcions to the of the petitioner according to Policy decision dated 01.10.2003 and 10.02.2004 (Annexures P-2 & P-3) or from the date when the benefit has been granted to the number of similarly
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present writ petition in view of the disputed questions of fact raised by the respondents and so as to take recourse to the alternative remedy available to him in accordance with law. with liberty as aforesaid.
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
: Yes/No
according to Policy 3) or from the date when the benefit has been granted to the number of similarly VISHAL SHARMA 2025.04.29 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document