[2025:RJ-JP:42668] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 6th Bail Application No. 13871/2025 Pulkit Yadav S/o Shri Jaikishan Yadav, Aged About 27 Years, R/o House No. 733, Surajpura House, Sardul Singh Ki Naal, Chini Ki Burj, Chhoti Chopad, Thana Kotwali Jaipur (North) At Present Plot No 36, S, Block, Ekta Nagar, Keshavpura, Girdharipura Thana Bhankrota Jaipur. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Ashish Gausinga Mr. Jkhlash Mohd. Mr. Rohit Meena HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/10/2025 1. The present sixth bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Pulkit Yadav S/o Shri Jaikishan Yadav seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.531/2024 Dated 18.08.2024 registered at P.S. Jhotwara District – Jaipur (West), for the offence under Sections 305(a), 115(2), 126(2) and 352 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the [2025:RJ-JP:42668] (2 of 3) [6th CRLMB-13871/2025] jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for applicant submits that the parties have entered into a compromise and same is attested by the trial Court. He further submits that the statement of two witnesses were recorded and both have turned hostile. He also submits that learned counsel for the complainant has no objection if the bail is granted to the present petitioner. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor but learned counsel for the complainant has considered the ground of bail as pleaded by the learned counsel for petitioner. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. Having considered the material placed on record and also the fact that the parties have settled their dispute and they have entered into a compromise, which has been attested by the trial Court and the petitioner was acquitted by the trial Court in compoundable charges, upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant- accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-accused. [2025:RJ-JP:42668] (3 of 3) [6th CRLMB-13871/2025] 7. Thus, the instant sixth bail application filed on behalf of applicant-accused Pulkit Yadav S/o Shri Jaikishan Yadav,, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail provided he would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 8. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/195