HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 18814 of 2013 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioner feels that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to him to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 17, 2025 NLY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Joshi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rahul Saxena (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Mahendra Pal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad