NAREM SIRISHA @ CHINTAMALLA SIRISHA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/27407/2023 · 2025-12-03
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42104 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42104 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010530662023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27407 OF 2023 Between:
1. NAREM SIRISHA @ CHINTAMALLA SIRISHA, , W/o Narem Nikhil Reddy, D/o Chintamalla Yesudanam, Aged about 25 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Oppicherla Village, Karampudi Mandal, Palnadu District. Erstwhile Guntur District ...Petitioner AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Inspector General of Police, East Coast Zone, Guntur, Guntur District. 3. The District Level Police Complaints Authority, Rep by its Chairman, Guntur Range, Guntur District. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Palnadu District, Narasaraopet. 5. The Circle Inspector of Police, Karempudi Circle, Karempudi, Palnadu District, erstwhile Guntur District. 6. Darla Jaya Kumar, S/o.Not known, Aged about 48 years, 0cc. Circle Inspector of Police, Karempudi Circle, Karempudi, Palnadu District, erstwhile Guntur District. 7. The Sub Inspector of Police, Karempudi Police Station, Karempudi, Palnadu District, erstwhile Guntur District. 8. M Ramanjaneyulu, , S/o.Not known, Aged about 45 years, Occ.Sub Inspector of Police, Karempudi Police Station, Karempudi, Palnadu District, erstwhile Guntur District.
...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in not responding to the petitioner's representation / complaint, dated 19-09- 2023 against the 6th respondent on the capacity of the 5th respondent and 8th respondent on the capacity of the 7th Respondent is as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and against GO Ms No 112, dated 01-08-2022 and consequently direct the ri Respondent to take action against the 6th respondent on the capacity of the 5th respondent and 8th respondent on the capacity of the 7th Respondent basing on the petitioner's representation / complaint, dated 19-09-2023 as per GO Ms No 112 dated 01-08-2022, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent to take action against the 6th respondent on the capacity of the 5th respondent and 8th respondent on the capacity of the 7th Respondent basing on the petitioner's representation / complaint, dated 19-09-2023 as per GO Ms No 112 dated 01-08-2022 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: CH VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27407 OF 2023 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in not responding to the petitioner's representation / complaint, dated 19-09-2023 against the 6th respondent on the capacity of the 5th respondent and 8th respondent on the capacity of the 7th Respondent is as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and against GO Ms No 112, dated 01-08-2022 and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to take action against the 6th respondent on the capacity of the 5th respondent and 8th respondent on the capacity of the 7th Respondent basing on the petitioner's representation / complaint, dated 19-09-2023 as per GO Ms No 112 dated 01-08- 2022, and pass
such other order or orders…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. V Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on written instructions, brought to the notice of this Court that basing on the complaint of the petitioner a crime was registered in Cr.No.124 of 2023 under Sections 498-A on the file of Karempudi Police Station, Palnadu District against the accused persons. 4. Recording the above said submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.12.2025 Ksj