1 2025:CGHC:2315 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2475 of 2018 1. Yogesh Sandilya S/o Ashok Sandilya Aged About 30 Years Caste Khairwar R/o Village Kansabel ,Madhuban Colony Thana and Tahsil Kansabel ,District Jashpur Chhattisgrh., 2. Ashok Sandilya S/o Vaidyanath Sandilya Aged About 55 Years Caste Khairwar R/o Village Kansabel, Madhuban Colony Thana and Tahsil Kansabel , District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 3. Smt. Vimla Sandilya W/o Ashok Sandilya Aged About 50 Years Caste Khairwar R/o Village Kansabel, Madhuban Colony Thana and Tahsil Kansabel, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 4. Gumtagar Sandilya S/o Ashok Sandilya Aged About 27 Years Caste Khairwar R/o Village Kansabel, Madhuban Colony Thana and Tahsil Kansabel, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1. Smt. Nandini Sandilya W/o Yogehs Sandilya Aged About 26 Years R/o Semartal Police Station Tapkara , Post OfÏce Tapkra Tehsil Tapkara , District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through Sub Divisional Magistrate Kunkuri District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2025.01.17 11:09:45 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Shivam Mishra, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate. For Respondents : Ms. Subha Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 14.01.2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners being aggrieved by the order dated 25.09.2018 passed in Criminal Revision No. 03/2018 by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kunkuri, Jashpur (C.G.) whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge has remitted the matter passed by learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate Kunkuri, to hear a fresh by providing opportunity in Misc. Criminal Case No. 09/2018. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has having no instruction as his client is not responding in the matter. 3. In view of the same, it transpires that the petitioners have lost their interest to pursue this matter due to efflux of time. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed on this ground alone and with liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate application, if the matter so survives. 5. Let a copy of this order be sent to the trial court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti