Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4210 (UTT)

PALLOVE SAH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/237/2025 · 2025-03-21

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.237 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Aayush Gaur, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous, as charge sheet has been submitted in the matter, which is not disputed by counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet before appropriate forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 21.03.2025 SK