1 2025:CGHC:46097 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 4688 of 2025 Ramawatar Agrawal S/o Late Shri Begraj Agrawal, Aged About 70 Years Posted Secretary M.M.I. Hospital Raipur (C.G.) R/o A-03, Anupam Nagar, Raipur, (C.G.), Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G.) ...Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Commerce And Industries Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Registrar Firms And Societies, Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - President Modern Medical Institute Society, Having Its Registered Office At-Dhamtari Road, Lalpur, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Pin Code 492001., District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Ravi Agrawal, Working Secretary, Modern Medical Institute Society, Having Its Registered Office At Dhamtari Road, Lalpur, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Pin Code 492001. ---- Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Rajat Agrawal, Advocate For State : Mr. Praveen Das, Dy. AG For Caveator : Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Abhyuday Singh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 10/09/2025 2 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been filed against the inaction and failure of respondent No.2-Registrar, Firms and Societies, Raipur in not fixing any date of hearing and taking effective steps on the petitioner application dated 19.08.2025 filed under Section 40(1) of the Chhattisgarh Society Registration Act, 1973 along with a stay application, seeing adjudication to the dispute relating to the petitioner removal from the post of Secretary of Modern Medical Institute Trust, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Reply to the petitioner as well as application seeking ad interim stay has been filed by respondent No.3, whereby it has been informed that the respondent No.2 has already issued notice to the respondent therein on 03.09.2025. Furthermore, the Registrar has taken up the matter for hearing on 09.09.2025. 3. Looking into the fact that the respondent No.2 has already issued notice to the respondents and seized of the matter the prayer prayed for in this writ petition has become infructuous. 4. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant