[2025:RJ-JP:39814] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11887/2025 1. Bahid Khan S/o Tayyab Khan, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Udpuri, Police Station Jaluki, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Abbas S/o Tayyab Khan, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Udpuri, Police Station Jaluki, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nonit Hatila for Mr. Ashving Garg For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 26/09/2025 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS are filed by the applicants-accused Bahid Khan S/o Tayyab Khan and Abbas S/o Tayyab Khan seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.104/2025 dated 11.08.2025 registered at P.S. Jaluki, Deeg for the offence under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 111(2) (b) and 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 66(D) of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants, have been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against them is complete and they are no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicants-accused from the [2025:RJ-JP:39814] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11887/2025] jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicants do not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicants undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for applicants-accused submitted that applicants-accused have not committed any cyber crime with anyone and not a single victim came forward to record his statement to police and from tomorrow, there is Navaratra and Vijayadashmi Festival and for celebrating the said Festivals with family members, the applicants may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants-accused. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, the Court finds that the grounds raised in support of the bail application, coupled with other facts such as absence of any apprehension regarding absconding of applicants- accused, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses, it is justified to grant of bail. 7. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Bahid Khan S/o Tayyab Khan and Abbas S/o Tayyab Khan, are hereby allowed and the applicants-accused are ordered to be released on bail with [2025:RJ-JP:39814] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11887/2025] condition that each of the applicant would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 8. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J ashu /181