Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42098 (ALL)

MAHIPAL SINGH AND ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA THRU SECY. AND OTHERS

WPIL/66855/2012 · 2025-10-05

Kunal Ravi Singh, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 66855 of 2012 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. In view of the office report dated 04.10.2025, notice is sufficient upon the petitioners. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioners feel that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to them to move an application for recalling this order within two months weeks from today. October 6, 2025 Priya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kshitij Shailendra Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I.(2012/5879), Samit Gopal(Elevated), Sanjay Kumar Singh (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Mahipal Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru Secy. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRIYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad