[2025:RJ-JP:51833] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17464/2024 Dr. Ganesh Singh Meena S/o Shri Shree Lal Meena, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Shiv Colony, Karauli, Presently Working As Deputy Director (Emergency Medicine Department) At District Hospital Karauli (Employee I.d. No. Rjka200826036458) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Deputy Director, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Dr. Dinesh Chand Gupta, Principal Medical Officer, District Hospital, Karauli. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak Mr. Harshvardhan Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- It is, therefore, prayed that this appeal may kindly be accepted and allowed and by an appropriate order or direction, impugned charge sheet and the resultant proceedings arising therefrom, may kindly be quashed and set-aside. Any other appropriate order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and [2025:RJ-JP:51833] (2 of 2) [CW-17464/2024] proper in the facts of the present case, also be passed in favour of the petitioner. 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /65