SHRI UMESH U v. OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX
WP/23748/2025 · 2025-11-12
S R Krishna Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42084 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42084 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47368 WP No. 23748 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 23748 OF 2025 (T-RES) BETWEEN:
SHRI UMESH U., AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O UDAYA KUMAR, NO.123/24/?/ 3RD CROSS, HMT LAYOUT, MATHIKERE, BENGALURU – 560 054
PRESENTLY R/AT:
NO.474, 1ST FLOOR, 4TH CROSS, TATANAGAR, KOGIGEHALLI POST, BENGALURU – 560 092 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BALRAM R. RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX BENGALURU NORTH COMMISSIONERATE, 1ST FLOOR, HMT BHAVAN, GANGA NAGAR, BELLARY ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 032 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED
ORDER-IN-ORIGINAL BEARING DIN-20240457000000282607 WHICH WAS GENERATED ON 24.04.2024 BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER CHAPTER V OF THE FINANCE ACT, 1994, (ANNEXURE - C) AS WELL AS THE SCN ISSUED UNDER SECTION 73 OF THE ACT ON 19.10.2021 BEARING DIN NO-20211057YW0000012053 AT ANNEXURE-B PASSED/GENERATED BY THE RESPONDENT.
Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47368 WP No. 23748 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-
“(i) Quashing the impugned Order-in-Original bearing DIN 20240457000000282607 which was generated on 24.04.2024 by the Respondent under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994, (ANNEXURE-C) as well as the SCN issued under section 73 of the Act on 19.10.2021 bearing DIN No.:20211057YW0000012053 at ANNEXURE – B passed/generated by the Respondent. (ii) Pass such other or further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fir in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of Justice and equity.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent and perused the material on record.
3. Though several contentions have been urged by both sides in support of their respective claims, the issue in controversy between the parties is directly and squarely covered by the
judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/s.Karnataka Chinmaya Seva Trust Vs. Joint Commissioner
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47368 WP No. 23748 of 2025
of Central Tax in WP No.11154/2023 & connected matters dated 03.07.2024, wherein it was held as under;
"13. Accordingly, the following:
ORDER In light of observations made above, the writ petitions relating to challenge to show-cause notice, such matters will stand relegated to the officers to be designated in terms of the observations made in para 8 above, at the same stage. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 5 in Column No.1 of the table relating to challenge to show-cause notice are disposed off. Insofar as such writ petitions as detailed in Column 2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original, in light of the discussion made above, the Orders-in-Original stand set aside and the matters are relegated to the Officers to be designated to be reconsidered from the stage of show-cause notice. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 35 in Column No.2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original are disposed off. The petitioners who are now relegated before the authorities concerned are at liberty to file their pleadings within a reasonable time as may be fixed by the Officers concerned. Wherever the matters are pending in appeal in light of the arrangement that is made, petitioners to file a memo for withdrawal of appeal and accordingly, the orders-in-original in question would also receive the same treatment, i.e. be set aside as per the directions made above. Wherever demands have been made pursuant to
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47368 WP No. 23748 of 2025
the impugned orders, such proceedings are also set aside."
4. Under these circumstances, the present petition is also
disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
5. Accordingly, the impugned
Order-in-original at Annexure-C dated 24.04.2024 is hereby quashed.
6. The matter is remitted back to the respondent to the stage of post show cause notice and to proceed further in accordance with law.
Ordered accordingly.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
BMC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12