1 2025:CGHC:44578 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10310 of 2025 1 - Yatendra Kumar Sinha S/o Shri Punu Ram Sinha Aged About 38 Years R/o Near Bsnl Office, Mahatam Gandhi Ward Post Nagri Tehsil Nagri District- Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Department Of School Education Indrawati Bhawan, Block - C, 1st Floor, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Divisional Joint Director Education Division Durg, District - Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice R avindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 02/09/2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition claiming the following reliefs: ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.09.03 12:08:59 +0530 2 “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for joining on the post of Teacher (English). 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to consider and decide the applications/representations (Annexure-P/5 & P/6) for joining on the post of Teacher (English) within some stipulated time period. 10.3 That, any other relief(s) which the Hon'ble Court deems fit & proper may kindly be pleased to granted in favour of the petitioners;” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would restricted his submissions that though the appointment order of the petitioner has been issued on 03.04.2025, but within time he could not joined at his place of posting and he made his representation on 23.04.2025 to the Respondent No. 3 but till date his representation has not been considered, therefore, the Respondent No. 3 may be directed to take a decision on his representation dated 23.04.2025 (Annexure P/5). 3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent/State though opposes on merits. However, he would submit that he has no objection if such a direction is being made to the Respondent No. 3 to take a decision on the pending representation of the petitioner in accordance with law. 4. Considering the limited submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the Respondent No. 3 to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 23.04.2025 (Annexure P/5) in accordance with law on 3 its own merits as per the applicable rules and circulars within three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order within a week from today to the Respondent No. 3. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the present writ petition is disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this Court has expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authorities concerned shall decide the representation of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law as per the applicable rules and circulars. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok