SOHAN LAL RUHELA S/O RATURAM RUHELA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/20275/2025 · 2025-12-19
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42073 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42073 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:51869] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20275/2025 Sohan Lal Ruhela S/o Raturam Ruhela, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Ward No. 48, Behind Police Line Balram Nagar Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The Principal, Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Manasi District Sikar
4. Shri Choturam Kanswa, Principal, Govt. Sr. Secondary School Manasi District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Kalwaniya For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pooja Sharma AAAG for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 19/12/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the impugned
order dated 22.09.2025 and relieving order dated 23.09.2025 (Annex. 1 & 2) passed by the respondents and Impugned Order dated 18.11.2025 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur in Appeal
[2025:RJ-JP:51869] (2 of 2) [CW-20275/2025] No.4616/2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii) By an issuing appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondents may kindly be directed to continue the petitioner on the post of Principal at Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Manasi Block Laxmangarh, District Sikar.
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /51