Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4207 (ORI)

BHASKAR BEHERA v. DIPAK KUMAR PARHI,I/C DISTRICT PROJECT OFFICER,SAMAGRA SHIKSHA,PURI

CONTC/5796/2025 · 2026-01-22

Dixit K S

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.5796 of 2025 Bhaskar Behera …. Petitioner Ms. M. Panda, Advocate -Versus- Dipak Kumar Parhi, (In-Charge), District Project Officer, Puri and others …. Opposite Parties Mrs. S. Pattanayak, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD Order No. 01. ORDER 22.01.2026 The complaint alleges violation of order dated 06.08.2025 entered in Complainant’s W.P.(C) No.21074 of 2025. 2. At the admission stage, learned AGA appearing for the Contemnors has filed a copy of the compliance order vide Office Order No. 127 dated 09.01.2026, which reads as under: “OFFICE ORDER The Hon'ble High Court disposed of the writ petition vide W.P. (C) No. 21074 of 2025 on 06.08.25 filed by Bhaskar Behera Vrs. State of Odisha & others and the operative portion of order is quoted below: "xxx In the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation within two weeks and should one be made, the same shall be decided within an outer limit of eight (8) weeks next following. All contentions are kept open.” That, in pursuance of Order dtd. 06.08.25 passed by the Hon'ble Court, the petitioner has not submitted any afresh representation before the authority concerned for consideration of his grievance i.e., for regularization of his leave period from 07.12.17 to 11.03.18. p. 2 That, Pursuant to Order of the Hon'ble Court, this opposite party instructed to Block Education Officer, Nimapara to enquire into the matter and report for further course of action vide this office letter No. 5747 dtd. 12.11.24. That, basing upon report of the BEO, Nimapara, this opposite party placed the details to the Collector-cum- Chairman, Samagra Shiksha, Puri for issuing necessary instructions in this regard. The Collector-cum Chairman, Samagra Shiksha, Puri instructed to examine the leave proposal with respect to leave sanctioned. Whereas, in response to the order of the Collector, Puri, this opposite party duly observed the official documents as well as report of the BEO, Nimapara and considered that the leave period from 07.12.17 to 11.03.18 to treat as No Work No Pay and said period of the petitioner may be regularized. The order dtd. 06.08.25 passed in W.P. (C) No. 21074 of 2025 of the Hon'ble Court is complied herewith and intimate to all concerned accordingly.” In the above circumstances, there is substantial compliance of the Writ and therefore, these proceedings are liable to be dropped with liberty to the Complainant to lay a challenge to the objectionable part of the said compliance order, if grounds do exist therefor. ( Dixit Krishna Shripad ) Judge Anisha Designation: Jr. Stenographer