Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4207 (KER)

KARTHIKEYAN KUNJAN, v. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER

WP(C)/9180/2025 · 2025-03-21

Ziyad Rahman A A

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:KER:24287 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 30TH PHALGUNA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 9180 OF 2025 PETITIONER/S: KARTHIKEYAN KUNJAN, AGED 75 YEARS S/O. KUNJAN, PARAMBADI HOUSE, ELAMKUNNAPPUZHA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682503 BY ADVS. SWARNA THOMAS MITHUN C THOMAS AKSHAY JOSEPH ADHIKARAM K.P.JENCY PAUL RESPONDENT/S: 1 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682001 2 VILLAGE OFFICER VILLAGE OFFICE, ELAMKUNAPPUZHA MALIPURAM P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682511 3 AGRICULTURAL OFFICER AGRICULTURAL OFFICE, ELAMKUNAPPUZHA, KRISHI BHAVAN ELAMKUNAPPUZHA, MALIPURAM P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682511 W.P.C No. 9180 of 2025 2 2025:KER:24287 OTHER PRESENT: Smt.Deepa.V, G.P THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.C No. 9180 of 2025 3 2025:KER:24287 JUDGMENT The petitioner is engaged in fish and shrimp farming in the properties having an extent of 22 hectares comprised in Re.Sy Nos.e Re.Sy. Nos. 397/1, 396/3, 388/3, 398/4, 389/4, 388/1, 389/4,5, 62/2,7, 390/1,8, 389/1, 399/1, 398/1,2, 389/2, 398/4, 399/1,2, 398/3, 398/5, 396/1,2,3, 397/1 and 388/2 in Re.Sy.Block No.9 of Elamkunappuzha Village, Kochi Taluk, Ernakulam District. For the purpose of cultivation he needs to use the machineries for strengthening the bund around the fields. Therefore the petitioner submitted Ext.P3 application before the 1st respondent seeking permission for the same. The limited relief sought by the petitioner is to direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on the same. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition. Accordingly, it is ordered that, the 2nd respondent shall take up Ext.P3 application and a decision on the same shall be W.P.C No. 9180 of 2025 4 2025:KER:24287 taken within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after giving the petitioner an opportunity for being heard. . It is further directed that, while considering the same, the observations made in Ext.P5 judgment passed by this Court in similar circumstances shall also be taken into account. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE rpk W.P.C No. 9180 of 2025 5 2025:KER:24287 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9180/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 27.11.2024. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 27.11.2024. Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 21.02.2025 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO 28345 DATED 21.02.2025 OF EXT.P3 APPLICATION Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMNT DATED 13.10.2020 IN WPC NO.21027 OF 2020