SMT. DURGA DEVI SMRITI SEWA SAMITI v. THE COLLECTOR AND EX-OFFICIO SECRETARY
WPC/3994/2019 · 2025-03-27
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42068 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42068 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
-1-
2025:CGHC:14916
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3994 of 2019 Smt. Durga Devi Smriti Sewa Samiti ( Registration No. Up. Pan./rpr/1303 ) Through Its President Rajiv Gupta Aged 48 Years S/o Sardarilal Gupta R/o Near Employment Office, Pandri, P.O. And P.S.- Pandri, Raipur, Tahsil And District-Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - The Collector And Ex-Officio Secretary Revenue Department State Of Chhattisgarh Gariaband, Tahsil And District- Gariaband Chhattisgarh, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Land Acquisition Officer-Cum-Sub-Divisional Officer Gariaband, Tahsil And District- Gariaband Chhattisgarh, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Executive Engineer Water Resources Division,gariaband Tahsil And District Gariaband Chhattisgarh, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Advocate For State : Mr. Vedang Shadangi, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 27.03.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that the order dated 05.08.2019 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Sub Divisional Officer Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE
-2- (Revenue), Gariyaband under the provisions of Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (for short, the Act, 2013) is appealable before the Collector according to the provisions of Section 73(3) of the Act, 2013; thus, this petition is not maintainable. 2) At this stage, Mr. Sharad Mishra, Advocate appearing for the petitioner would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the concerned authority according to the provisions of Section 73(3) of the Act,
2013. 3) No objection from the other side. 4) Permission granted. 5) Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as stated above. 6) If the petitioner prefers an appeal before the concerned authority, it is expected that the authority concerned shall decide the appeal expeditiously in objective manner. 7) With the aforesaid observation and direction, the instant writ petition is hereby
disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge NADIM