APHC010511792025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2512/2025 Between: 1. BYREDDY KARUNAKAR REDDY, S/O B.SIVA SANKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O H.NO. 1-130-23, DIGUVAPADU ROAD GARGEYAPURAM-518452 KURNOOL MANDAL AND DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. K SUBRAMANYAM, s/o S.Ramachandraiah, aged About 55 years, r/o D.No. 10-48, Yogimallavaram, Tiruchanur Post, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District-517 503 ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BABUJI TENNETI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. NJS,J C.R.P No.2512 of 2025 2 The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff. 2. As per the memo of proof of service dated 28.10.2025, the personal notice sent to the sole respondent is returned with an endorsement “refused”. Hence, the notice is deemed to have been served. Despite service of notice, respondent did not choose to enter appearance. Be that as it may. 3. The grievance of the petitioner in the present revision petition is non- disposal of I.A No.139 of 2025 on the file of the Court of the III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati. 4. The petitioner/plaintiff filed the said application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 and Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, for grant of the interim injunction, restraining the respondent/defendant, his men, agents etc., from any way interfering with the petitioner/plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment over the plaint schedule property till the disposal of the suit. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the said I.A., the respondent/defendant filed counter-affidavit long back. He submits that in fact the respondent/defendant had already filed his written statement and due to non-disposal of the I.A., the petitioner/plaintiff is being subjected to great hardship and serious prejudice. He submits that unless the learned Trial Court is directed to dispose of the above said I.A. as expeditiously as possible, the petitioner/plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss. NJS,J C.R.P No.2512 of 2025 3 6. Considering the innocuous relief sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without going into the merits of the case deems it appropriate to dispose of the revision petition, providing that the learned Trial Court shall make endeavor to dispose of I.A No.139 of 2025 in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. 7. With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:31.10.2025 Ksj