Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42051 (AP)

VARTANA LINGAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/33348/2025 · 2025-12-01

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

DR,J W.P.No.33348 of 2025 APHC010640422025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 33348/2025 Between: 1. VARTANA LINGAMMA, W/O LATE LAXMAYYA, ABOUT 77YEARS OCC AGRICULTURE, KONTHILI VILLAGE HUKUMPETA MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHA RAMARAJU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE-DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PADERU, ALLURI SEETHA RAMARAJU DISTRICT 3. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL, PADERU, ALLURI SEETHA RAMARAJU DISTRICT 4 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PADERU, ALLURI SEETHA RAMARAJU DISTRICT 5. VARTHANA NEELAMMA, W/O LATE NEELAKANTESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, CHNADRIPUTTU VILLAGE, PADERU MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHA RAMARAJU DISTRICT 6. 6. VARTHANA GANGAMMA, W/O LATE BALAYYA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCCAGRICULTURE, CHNADRIPUTTU VILLAGE, PADERU MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHA RAMARAJU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): DR,J W.P.No.33348 of 2025 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the impugned proceedings of the 4TH respondent vide RG no.319/2024/SA/dt.29.7.2025 is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of the Art. 14, 21 and 300(A) Of Constitution of India and violation of the Sec 5 of ROR Act, and also violation of the principles of natural Justice and Consequently set aside the same by directing the respondent no. 2 to 4 to mutate the petitioner name in the revenue records for the petitioner ancestral schedule property in survey no. 9-4 for an Ext. of Ac. 0.15 cents out of Ac. 0.30 cents and in survey no. 25-1 for an Ext. of Ac. 1.45 cents out of Ac. 2.89 cents and for the total Ext. of Ac. 3.19 cents at sundriputtu village , paderu mandal, alluri seetharamaraju district and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings of the 4TH respondent vide RG no.319/2024/SA/dt.29.7.2025 and pass such other order or orders as this Honhle Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TOTA TEJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE DR,J W.P.No.33348 of 2025 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed questioning the endorsement issued on 29.07.2025 wherein the 4th respondent has considered the application filed under PGRS and decided the said application directing the petitioner to file ROR appeal against the endorsement before the Sub Collector. 2. On perusal of the impugned order, the Tahsildar has rightly suggested to file ROR appeal before the Sub Collector against the entries made in favour of unofficial respondents. 3. In view of the same, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. Accordingly, notice to respondent Nos.5 and 6 are dispensed with giving liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate appeal before the competent authority. If any appeal is filed already, the same may be considered and disposed of within reasonable time. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 02.12.2025 Dvs DR,J W.P.No.33348 of 2025 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH 307 WRIT PETITION No.33348 of 2025 Dated: 02.12.2025 Dvs