VINAY YADAV v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/11323/2025 · 2025-04-16
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42051 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42051 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:56688 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11323 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinay Yadav Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :-
"To, Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus respondent no.2 to decide the Case No.7519/2017 bearing computerize Case No. T 2017052055017519 (Lallan and others Versus Sukhdeo) under section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as expeditiously as possible preferably by way of day to day hearing within stipulated period.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above-mentioned case is pending consideration and the same has not been decided till date.
Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the above-mentioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties as well as giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case provided there is no other legal impediment.
Order Date :- 17.4.2025 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.] Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad