SAHAJ VISHWAS URJA PVT. LTD. v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
CRMP/1932/2022 · 2025-07-08
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42050 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42050 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:31528-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1932 of 2022 Sahaj Vishwas Urja Pvt. Ltd. O/o 503, Nrk, Biz Park Pu-4 Behind C21,mall Scheme No. 54, Indore Mp-452010 Through Its Director, Mohit Pandya S/o Shri Harish Chandra Pandya Aged About 33 Year.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Police Station Surguja Ambikapur, District Ambikapur (C.G.) 2 - Sanjay Mittal S/o Satyanarayan Agrawal Aged About 50 Years R/o Agrasen Ward, Sarguja, District Ambikapur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Tekam on behalf of Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
, Judge
Judgment
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
09.07.2025
1. Heard Mr. Vinod Kumar Tekam on behalf of Mr. Vinay Sharma,
learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondent No.1 / State. MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.07.10 10:39:06 +0530
2
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:
“It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned FIR vide crime No.889/2022 dated 20.10.2022 registered at Police Station Ambikapur District Ambikapur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under section 406, 420 of Indian Penal Code 1960 against the present applicant and may kindly be further be pleased to quash entire further proceeding in relation with crime No.889/2022 in the interest of justice.”
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has already been amicably settled between the parties outside the Court. He further submits that the petitioner has already been granted bail by the Competent Authority.
4. On the other hand, Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1/State submits that the investigation in the matter is still pending.
5. Considering the above submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has already been amicably settled between the parties, the parties are directed to appear before the Investigating Officer concerned, who after verifying the settlement arrived between the parties, shall submit a police report under Section 173(2) of the Cr.P.C. (193(2) of the BNSS) before the appropriate Court, in accordance with law.
6. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed off. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet