APHC010483402024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No: 25084/2024 Between: 1. K BHARATHY, W/O. ANJI MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCCUPATION- AGRICULTURE, R/O. RACHAVERTIVARIPALLE, GARAJABURJU, NIMMANAPALLE MANDAL, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR-517325, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. M. JAGADEESH BABU,, S/O. RAMA CHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. OCCUPATION- AGRICULTURE, R/O. 8-77, RACHAVERTIVARIPALLE, GARAJABURJU, NIMMANAPALLE MANDAL, MADANAPALLE, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOR HOME, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NIMMANAPALLE POLICE STATION, MADANAPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. P MURAD KHAN, S/O. GHOUSE KHAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. OCCUPATION- CULTIVATION, R/O. POTHABOLU VILLAGE, MADANAPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. ARFATH KHAN, S/O. P. MURAD KHAN, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. OCCUPATION- CULTIVATION, R/O. POTHABOLU VILLAGE, MADANAPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. AISHWARYA NAGULA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KANUKOLANU SRI SAI SANJAY 2 2. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of Respondents 1 to 3 in preventing the Petitioners from entering their own property i.e.. agricultural property admeasuring Ac. 8.05 cents situated in Sy. No. 701/4 and 702/3 Rachavertivaripalle, Nimmanapalle Mandal, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently direct Respondents No. 1 to 3 not to provide any police protection to Respondents 4 and 5 that would restrict the Petitioners access to and peaceful enjoyment of their own property.” 2. None represented for the Petitioner. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere with the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.12.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25084 of 2024 Dt.20.12.2025 Dinesh