Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42035 (CHH)

HARIDAS MANIKPURI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/10449/2025 · 2025-09-03

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:45450 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10449 of 2025 1 - Haridas Manikpuri S/o Mohandas Manikpuri Aged About 53 Years Occupation Teacher, Government Middle School Bela Block Division Korba, District Korba C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Director Public Instruction Directorate, Chhattisgarh First Floor, C-Block Indiravati Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3 - Joint Director, Education Department Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. 4 - Collector And Chairman District Rationalization Committee Korba, District Korba C.G. 5 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Revenue) Korba, District Korba C.G. 6 - Block Education Officer, Korba, District Korba C.G. 7 - Divya Sahu Teacher Middle School Bela, Block Division Korba, District Korba C.G. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 04-09-2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2025.09.17 13:27:35 +0530 2 present writ petition with liberty to pursue the representation made before the authority concerned by the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State would oppose and submits that WPS No.4423 of 2025 filed by the petitioner has been dismissed on merits and therefore, no liberty can be granted to the petitioner to pursue his representation. 3. Considering the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present writ petition, however, if he pursue his representation before the authorities concerned, the same may be considered in accordance with law keeping in view the order dated 16-06- 2025 passed by this Court in WPS No.4423 of 2025 filed by the petitioner for redressal of his grievances. 4. With the aforesaid observation and liberty in favour of the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil