APHC010445952023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22983 OF 2023 Between: 1. M.Krishna Murthy, s/o Varada Rao, aged 55 years, R/o D.No. 11-10-38, near kota, VTC, Hindupur, Anantapur District. 2. Smt.Sharadamma, w/o late.Konda Reddy, aged 48 years, H.No. 4n, 4th ward, Buldcapatnam, Anantapur. 3. K.Narayana swamy, s/o Konaiah, aged 65 years, D.No. 3-320-c, BC Colony, Chennekothapalli, Anantapur. 4. J.Anjanamma, w/o J.Hanumanthu , age 73 years, H.No. 5/183, Venkatampalli, VTC Poletipalle, PO Poletipalle, Chennekothapalli, Anantapuram District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of A P, Rep. By it's Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Satya Sai District, Puttaparthi, 3. The Superintendent of Police, Puttaparthi, Satya Sai District. 4. The Tahsildar, Chenna Kothapalli Mandal, Satya Sai Dist. 5. The State S H O, Chenne Kotha Palli P.S., Puttaparthy District. 6. S Narayana, s/o S.Narasappa, aged about 55 years,Venkatareddy Palli village, Penukonda Mandal, Satya Sai District. 7. K Ramanjaneyulu, s/o K.Ramanna, aged about 43 years, D.No.5/60, Nyamaddala village, C.K.Palli Mandal, Satya Sai District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to declaring the action respondents more particularly one in the writ of Mandamus or any other writ declaring the action of the respondent No.5 not to take any action on the complaint lodged by the petitioners relating to plots situated in Survey No. 257-1 of weavers Colony, Chenne Kotha Palli fields, Chennekotha Palli Panchayath area, Chenne Kotha Palli Mandal, Sree Satya Sai District District is as illegal, arbitrary and against law and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 take action against the respondents 6 and 7 and grant police aid to the petitioners and also be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to consider representation/complaint dated,20-1-2023 and protect the petitioners plots situated in Survey No. 257-1 of weavers Colony, Chenne Kotha Palli fields, Chennekotha Palli Panchayath area, Chenne Kotha Palli Mandal, Sree Satya Sai District District pending disposal of the writ petition and also be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioners: INENI VENKATA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22983 OF 2023 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “….Pleased to declaring the action respondents more particularly one in the writ of Mandamus or any other writ declaring the action of the respondent No.5 not to take any action on the complaint lodged by the petitioners relating to plots situated in Survey No. 257-1 of weavers Colony, Chenne Kotha Palli fields, Chennekotha Palli Panchayath area, Chenne Kotha Palli Mandal, Sree Satya Sai District District is as illegal, arbitrary and against law and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 take action against the respondents 6 and 7 and grant police aid to the petitioners and also be pleased to pass such other orders...” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submits that, based on the contents in the complaint made by the petitioner, it is found that the matter is civil in nature, as such the police have not given any police aid to the parties. He further submits that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Recording the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of. The petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.12.2025 Ksj