Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42016 (MAD)

M.Sivappa v. Thiru. Gagandeep Singh Bedi, IAS., and 4 others

CONT P/1051/2025 · 2025-03-27

G Arul Murugan, R Subramanian

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.No. 1051 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.03.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Contempt Petition No. 1051 of 2025 M.Sivappa ...Petitioner Vs. 1.Thiru.Gangandeep Singh Bedi, IAS, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai ~ 600 009. 2.Thiru.P.Ponniah, IAS, The Director of Rural Development, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai ~ 15. 3.Thiru C.Dinesh Kumar, IAS, The District Collector, Krishnagiri District. 4.Thiru.Ramajayam, The Personal Assistant (Development), to the District Collector, Krishnagiri District. 5.Thiru D.Magesh Kumaran The Block Development Offier, Veppanapalli Panchayat Union, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No. 1051 of 2025 Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the respondents for disobeying the order dated 03.03.2025 passed in W.A.No.310 of 2025. For Petitioner : Ms.Dakshayani Reddy For Respondents : Mr.R.Ramam Lal Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.S.John J.Raja Singh Additional Government Pleader O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) Complaining that the order dated 10.03.2025 passed regularizing services of the petitioner are not in compliance with the orders passed by the Division Bench in W.A.No.310 of 2025, the petitioner has come up with this Contempt Petition. 2. We do no think, we can entertain the contempt petition. The Authorities have purpotedly obeyed the order of this Court made in W.A.No.310 of 2025 dated 03.03.2025. If the petitioner feels that the compliance is not in terms of the order, it is for the petitioner to challenge the order dated 10.03.2025 and there cannot be any contempt. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No. 1051 of 2025 3. Hence, this Contempt Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 10.03.2025 in accordance with law. (R.S.M., J.) (G.A.M., J.) 27.03.2025 kkn Index: No Speaking order Neutral Citation : No 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No. 1051 of 2025 To: 1.Thiru.Gangandeep Singh Bedi, IAS, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai ~ 600 009. 2.Thiru.P.Ponniah, IAS, The Director of Rural Development, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai ~ 15. 3.Thiru C.Dinesh Kumar, IAS, The District Collector, Krishnagiri District. 4.Thiru.Ramajayam, The Personal Assistant (Development), to the District Collector, Krishnagiri District. 5.Thiru D.Magesh Kumaran The Block Development Offier, Veppanapalli Panchayat Union, Krishnagiri District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No. 1051 of 2025 R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. KKN Contempt Petition No. 1051 of 2025 27.03.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis