RADHIKA CARRIERS v. THE ABOHAR COOP.SPINNING MILLS LTD.
RSA/2498/2001 · 2025-07-02
Suvir Sehgal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42011 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42011 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 206 RSA-2498-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.07.2025 RADHIKA CARRIERS ... Appellant V/S THE ABOHAR COOPERATIVE SPINNING MILLS LTD.
... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Puneet Kansal, Advocate (through VC) for respondent No.1. Service of respondents No. 2 and 3 was ordered to be dispensed with by this Court vide order dated 02.02.2004. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL)
1. Mr. C.M. Munjal, counsel for the appellant states that he does not have any instructions.
2. Notice issued to the sole appellant has been received back with the report as under:-
“Unserved with report that Mr. Vijay Nagpal, the authorized agent of Radhika Carriers is severely ill, lacks movement and is unable to speak.”
3. It seems that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal.
4. Dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
5. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to seek revival in case anything worthwhile survives for consideration.
02.07.2025.
(SUVIR SEHGAL) pooja saini JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Pooja Saini 2025.07.04 10:06 I attest the integrity and accuracy of this order/judgment