Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42010 (PNJ)

ASHOK KUMAR v. SHARDA

CRM-M/39130/2018 · 2025-03-28

Mahabir Singh Sindhu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M No.39130 of 2018 (O&M) -1- 202 (2nd case) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.39130 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.03.2025 Ashok Kumar ... Petitioner Versus Sharda ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU Present: Mr. Mandeep Singh Sachdev, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.D.S.Hooda, Advocate for the respondent. **** MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’), inter alia, for quashing of impugned order dated 24.08.2018 (P-1), passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib, vide which revision filed by the respondent has been allowed and order dated 07.09.2017, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Malout, whereby application field by the respondent under Section 65 of the Evidence Act to permit respondent to lead secondary evidence was dismissed, has been set aside. GAGANDEEP 2025.04.03 20:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M No.39130 of 2018 (O&M) -2- (2) At the outset, learned Counsel on instructions from the petitioner submits that matter has been amicably settled between the parties at their own level; thus, present petition be disposed off as not pressed. (3) Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. 28th March, 2025 ( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU ) Gagan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No GAGANDEEP 2025.04.03 20:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh