Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42004 (RAJ)

LAXMI KANT @ LUCKY RANA S/O SHRI NANDLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMA/151/2025 · 2025-04-07

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:15553] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 151/2025 In S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3108/2025 Laxmi Kant @ Lucky Rana S/o Shri Nandlal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 3-F-44, Dadabadi Vistar Yojana, Nasiya Ji Mandir Ke Pass, P.s. Dadabadi, Kota City (Raj.). (Accused At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mritunjay Sharma for Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/04/2025 1. The criminal misc. Application under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking correction/rectification in the order dated 04.03.2025 passed by this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3108/2025. 2. In the aforementioned order, on account of an inadvertent typographical error, in fourth paragraph, it has been mentioned that facility of pre-arrest bail has been granted to the petitioner whereas post-arrest bail was granted to the petitioner. 3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed. In fourth paragraph of the order dated 04.03.2025, “facility of pre-arrest bail has been granted to the petitioner by [2025:RJ-JP:15553] (2 of 2) [CRLMA-151/2025] Hon’ble Apex Court” shall be read as “facility of post-arrest bail has been granted to the petitioner by Hon’ble Apex Court”. 4. This order shall be read as part and parcel of the order dated 04.03.2025. 5. Accordingly, this criminal misc. application is allowed. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN ), J LALIT MOHAN /506