Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42004 (KAR)

MR GAURAV SHARMA v. MS JEENA B

WP/25887/2025 · 2025-09-12

M Nagaprasanna

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36308 WP No. 25887 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 25887 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. MR. GAURAV SHARMA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMESH KUMAR SHARMA R/AT NO.39, JOHN BULL STREET BENGALURU – 560 047. 2. MS.SHILPA BASAVARAJ PROPRIETRESS OF M/S YUVAN INC AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS D/O LATE BASAVARAJ 3 AND 4TH FLOOR, NO.29 NANJAPPA MANSION K.H.ROAD, SHANTINAGARA BENGALURU – 560 027. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI K.S.PONNAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MS. JEENA B., AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O VINAY KUMAR JAIN Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36308 WP No. 25887 of 2025 2. MR.JEETENDRA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O JAYANTILAL PALRECHA RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT NO.334, 36 ‘A’ CROSS 9TH MAIN, 5TH BLOCK, JAYANAGARA BENGALURU – 560 041. 3. RUKMINI AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, D/O LATE T.MUNIYAPPA W/O SRI HANUMANTHA RAJ H R/AT NO.10, 2ND MAIN, 5TH CROSS MARUTHI NILAYA, GOVINDARAJNAGAR BENGALURU – 560 040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SANATH KUMAR SHETTY K., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE XIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH - 28) TO PASS ORDERS ON IA NO.1 OF 2025 FILED IN O.S.NO. 743 OF 2025 WITHIN A STIPULATED TIME FRAME. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36308 WP No. 25887 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioners/defendants 1 and 2 are before this Court seeking a direction to pass necessary orders on I.A.No.1 of 2025 filed in O.S.No.743 of 2025 within a stipulated time. 2. Heard Sri K S Ponnappa, learned counsel appearing for petitioners and Sri Sanath Kumar Shetty, learned counsel appearing for respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection for an order of that kind. 4. In that light, I deem it appropriate to dispose the petition directing the concerned Court to dispose the application, I.A.No.1 of 2025 in the subject suit, within an outer limit of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order, if not earlier or if not already disposed. 5. In the light of the order of status quo subsisting as on today, the same would continue for a period of 4 weeks, by which time the concerned Court is directed to dispose the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36308 WP No. 25887 of 2025 application. Merely because the interim order of status quo is granted by this Court, the concerned Court shall not be influenced by it and shall pass necessary orders in accordance with law. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE BKP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27